The pattern validator by default uses the JDK regular expression implementation which is not ECMA-262 compliant and is thus not compliant with the JSON Schema specification. The library can however be configured to use a ECMA-262 compliant regular expression implementation.
Annotation processing and reporting are implemented. Note that the collection of annotations will have an adverse performance impact.
This implements the Flag, List and Hierarchical output formats defined in the Specification for Machine-Readable Output for JSON Schema Validation and Annotation.
The implementation supports the use of custom keywords, formats, vocabularies and meta-schemas.
There are currently no known issues with the required functionality from the specification.
The following are the tests results after running the JSON Schema Test Suite as at 29 Jan 2024 using version 1.3.1. As the test suite is continously updated, this can result in changes in the results subsequently.
| Implementations | Overall | DRAFT_03 | DRAFT_04 | DRAFT_06 | DRAFT_07 | DRAFT_2019_09 | DRAFT_2020_12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetworkNt | pass: r:4703 (100.0%) o:2369 (100.0%) fail: r:0 (0.0%) o:1 (0.0%) |
pass: r:600 (100.0%) o:251 (100.0%) fail: r:0 (0.0%) o:0 (0.0%) |
pass: r:796 (100.0%) o:318 (100.0%) fail: r:0 (0.0%) o:0 (0.0%) |
pass: r:880 (100.0%) o:541 (100.0%) fail: r:0 (0.0%) o:0 (0.0%) |
pass: r:1201 (100.0%) o:625 (100.0%) fail: r:0 (0.0%) o:0 (0.0%) |
pass: r:1226 (100.0%) o:634 (99.8%) fail: r:0 (0.0%) o:1 (0.2%) |
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 🟢 | Fully implemented |
| 🟡 | Partially implemented |
| 🔴 | Not implemented |
| 🚫 | Not defined |
| Keyword | Draft 4 | Draft 6 | Draft 7 | Draft 2019-09 | Draft 2020-12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $anchor | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| $defs | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| $dynamicAnchor | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 |
| $dynamicRef | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 |
| $id | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| $recursiveAnchor | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🚫 |
| $recursiveRef | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🚫 |
| $ref | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| $vocabulary | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| additionalItems | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| additionalProperties | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| allOf | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| anyOf | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| const | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| contains | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| contentEncoding | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| contentMediaType | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| contentSchema | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| definitions | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🚫 | 🚫 |
| dependencies | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🚫 | 🚫 |
| dependentRequired | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| dependentSchemas | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| enum | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| exclusiveMaximum (boolean) | 🟢 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 |
| exclusiveMaximum (numeric) | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| exclusiveMinimum (boolean) | 🟢 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 |
| exclusiveMinimum (numeric) | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| if-then-else | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| items | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| maxContains | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| minContains | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| maximum | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| maxItems | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| maxLength | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| maxProperties | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| minimum | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| minItems | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| minLength | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| minProperties | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| multipleOf | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| not | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| oneOf | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| pattern | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| patternProperties | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| prefixItems | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 |
| properties | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| propertyNames | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| readOnly | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| required | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| type | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| unevaluatedItems | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| unevaluatedProperties | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| uniqueItems | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| writeOnly | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
In accordance with the specification, unknown keywords are treated as annotations. This is customizable by configuring a unknown keyword factory on the respective meta-schema.
Since Draft 2019-09, the contentEncoding keyword does not generate assertions.
Since Draft 2019-09, the contentMediaType keyword does not generate assertions.
The contentSchema keyword does not generate assertions.
By default the pattern keyword uses the JDK regular expression implementation validating regular expressions.
This is not ECMA-262 compliant and is thus not compliant with the JSON Schema specification. This is however the more likely desired behavior as other logic will most likely be using the default JDK regular expression implementation to perform downstream processing.
The library can be configured to use a ECMA-262 compliant regular expression validator which is implemented using joni. This can be configured by setting setEcma262Validator to true.
This also requires adding the joni dependency.
<dependency>
<!-- Used to validate ECMA 262 regular expressions -->
<groupId>org.jruby.joni</groupId>
<artifactId>joni</artifactId>
<version>${version.joni}</version>
</dependency>Since Draft 2019-09 the format keyword only generates annotations by default and does not generate assertions.
This can be configured on a schema basis by using a meta schema with the appropriate vocabulary.
| Version | Vocabulary | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Draft 2019-09 | https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/vocab/format |
true |
| Draft 2020-12 | https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/vocab/format-assertion |
true/false |
This behavior can be overridden to generate assertions by setting the setFormatAssertionsEnabled option to true.
| Format | Draft 4 | Draft 6 | Draft 7 | Draft 2019-09 | Draft 2020-12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| date | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| date-time | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| duration | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | |
| hostname | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| idn-email | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| idn-hostname | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| ipv4 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| ipv6 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| iri | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| iri-reference | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| json-pointer | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| relative-json-pointer | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| regex | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| time | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| uri | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| uri-reference | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| uri-template | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
| uuid | 🚫 | 🚫 | 🟢 | 🟢 | 🟢 |
When the format assertion vocabularies are used in a meta schema, in accordance to the specification, unknown formats will result in assertions. If the format assertion vocabularies are not used, unknown formats will only result in assertions if the assertions are enabled and if setStrict("format", true).
- Note that the validation are only optional for some of the keywords/formats.
- Refer to the corresponding JSON schema for more information on whether the keyword/format is optional or not.