Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize on "agent" #1118

Closed
fallwith opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Standardize on "agent" #1118

fallwith opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@fallwith
Copy link
Contributor

fallwith commented Apr 26, 2022

We sometimes capitalize "Agent" and sometimes don't. We are inconsistent across our documentation, comments, and the text that is generated and placed in front of users.

We should decide on either a single standard of "Agent" or "agent" or write up some rules if we think both are useful for different contexts.

Recently with #1034 we went with "agent" for the README, and that seemed to match what most of the other agent repos have done.

@angelatan2
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @fallwith after you and the team decide, I think this may be a good "good first issue" or "help wanted" type of story for new community members who want to dabble in our agent. What do you think?

@fallwith
Copy link
Contributor Author

@angelatan2 that's a terrific idea!

@fallwith
Copy link
Contributor Author

fallwith commented Jun 1, 2022

"agent" is desired

@angelatan2 angelatan2 changed the title Standardize on "Agent" or "agent" Standardize on "agent" Jun 27, 2022
@angelatan2 angelatan2 moved this from Triage to Backlog in Ruby Engineering Board Jun 27, 2022
@elucus
Copy link
Contributor

elucus commented Jun 27, 2022

@workato-integration
Copy link

@hannahramadan
Copy link
Contributor

Closed with #2295

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants