Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add prettylink support by default #86

Closed
jasonbayton opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Add prettylink support by default #86

jasonbayton opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 7 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@jasonbayton
Copy link

For future versions of the NC snap, please enable prettylinks by default.

@oparoz oparoz added the feature New feature or request label Oct 7, 2016
@oparoz oparoz changed the title Feature request: Add prettylink support by default Add prettylink support by default Oct 9, 2016
@kyrofa
Copy link
Member

kyrofa commented Oct 12, 2016

Sounds like there are issues caused by this, no?

@kyrofa kyrofa mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2016
@kyrofa
Copy link
Member

kyrofa commented Nov 1, 2016

Closing due to inactivity.

@kyrofa kyrofa closed this as completed Nov 1, 2016
@jasonbayton
Copy link
Author

Aren't feature requests kept open until implemented?

@kyrofa
Copy link
Member

kyrofa commented Nov 1, 2016

  1. You didn't address my concerns after 20 days.
  2. There's another issue open for the same thing (Use pretty URLs #115) with more participants. Though my question isn't being answered over there, either. Please feel free to participate in that discussion.

@jasonbayton
Copy link
Author

Not being a NC developer I wouldn't have answered either way. Will do.

@kyrofa
Copy link
Member

kyrofa commented Nov 1, 2016

In the future you might consider answering with "I don't know," instead of simply not answering 😄 . I can't enable a feature for everyone without knowing its ramifications, particularly if a quick google reveals potential problems with it. When you log a bug or request a feature, you should be prepared to discuss it.

@jasonbayton
Copy link
Author

OK, it was in the context of a discussion on help.nc which I admittedly left out. Know for next time!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants