Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Effort scales on cards #3661

Closed
daudtivan opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Effort scales on cards #3661

daudtivan opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@daudtivan
Copy link

  • Please use the 馃憤 reaction to show that you are affected by the same issue.
  • Please don't comment if you have no relevant information to add. It's just extra noise for everyone subscribed to this issue.
  • Subscribe to receive notifications on status change and new comments.

Describe the solution you'd like
A way to define a "weight" to a given card, representing the effort necessary to conclude it.
It should allow different units of measurements like: hours, decimal points, lists {S, M, L, XL,...}, Fibonacci {1, 3, 5, 8,...}
The author or the person assigned to the card should be able to modify its scale value (so people can discuss it somewhere else and update the card).

Describe alternatives you've considered
I could get close to it using tags, but only simple "size" lists would work like S, M, L...
Anything else becomes confuse and requires maintaining both lists of tags + cards.

Additional context
I'm not suggesting a full collaborative card scale definition tool here (but you hv my vote if you decide so). All I'm proposing is a placeholder (field or attribute) where the estimated workload of a card is registered by its author or the person it's assigned to.
I've made a sketch of what I believe represents my idea (in addition to #3660 )
card-scale

@dodedodo
Copy link

This issue and the other issue mentioned are both subsets of #1833

@daudtivan
Copy link
Author

Ok. Tks for the feedback.
Glad to know there's something already in the pipeline for that matter.
If NC/Deck wants to compare with Trello, this is coming late to the discussion.
Just voted in favor of that then. Hope it helps.

@juliushaertl
Copy link
Member

Will close this as a duplicate of #1833 then

@juliushaertl juliushaertl closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants