Fix graaljs multithreaded access #17
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
daslu
added a commit
to scicloj/clay
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2023
…ltithreading problems probably related: nextjournal/markdown#17
Restore GraalJS and Java versions to previous
zampino
force-pushed
the
fix-graaljs-multithreading
branch
from
2b0d579
to
4f78044
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Parsing markdown from different threads leads to known exceptions like
this is an attempt to properly lock graaljs contexts following examples in
https://www.graalvm.org/latest/reference-manual/js/Multithreading/#multithreading-with-java-and-javascript