Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'jitter' effect #45

Closed
h-bouzid opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

'jitter' effect #45

h-bouzid opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@h-bouzid
Copy link

Hi dear @nihaomiao

Congratulations on your very interesting work! I'm curious about the role of data jittering. If it's to prevent model overfitting, why was it implemented only in the DM and not in the LFAE? and have you tested running the DM without jittering the data?

Thank you in advance 😁

@nihaomiao
Copy link
Owner

Hi, @h-bouzid, thanks a lot for your interest in our work! To be honest, I have not noticed this point before. But LFAE is initialized with a pretrained model. It would be OK without using "jitter". I have not tested training the DM without using "jitter". In general, data augmentation should not have negative effects.

@h-bouzid
Copy link
Author

h-bouzid commented May 2, 2024

Thank you for your answer @nihaomiao.

@h-bouzid h-bouzid closed this as completed May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants