You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Nikola
I think there is an extra factor in the pondermotive polarizability. Since in AC field, the polarizability is defined as U = 1/4*\alpha_{AC} * E^2 compared to that of DC: U = 1/2*\alpha_{DC} * E^2. It is just a minor factor of 2 but I think it still worth to point it out.
As it happens with polarizability definitions, there might be in literature multiple versions differing by factor of 2 from one another. It is similar situation as with static (DC) polarizability where also some people defined it with or without additional factor of 2.
The definition used in ARC is consistent with e.g. this paper .
In order to prevent confusion, clarification should be added in documentation (in addition to what is written in manuscript detailing new version ).
Hi Nikola
I think there is an extra factor in the pondermotive polarizability. Since in AC field, the polarizability is defined as U = 1/4*\alpha_{AC} * E^2 compared to that of DC: U = 1/2*\alpha_{DC} * E^2. It is just a minor factor of 2 but I think it still worth to point it out.
ARC-Alkali-Rydberg-Calculator/arc/calculations_atom_single.py
Line 2555 in 3673a60
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: