Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pondermotive polarizability conventional constant factor #50

Closed
zzpwahaha opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Pondermotive polarizability conventional constant factor #50

zzpwahaha opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@zzpwahaha
Copy link

Hi Nikola
I think there is an extra factor in the pondermotive polarizability. Since in AC field, the polarizability is defined as U = 1/4*\alpha_{AC} * E^2 compared to that of DC: U = 1/2*\alpha_{DC} * E^2. It is just a minor factor of 2 but I think it still worth to point it out.

alphaP = C_e**2 / (2 * C_m_e * driveOmega**2 * C_h)

@nikolasibalic
Copy link
Owner

Hi @zzpwahaha ,

As it happens with polarizability definitions, there might be in literature multiple versions differing by factor of 2 from one another. It is similar situation as with static (DC) polarizability where also some people defined it with or without additional factor of 2.

The definition used in ARC is consistent with e.g. this paper .

In order to prevent confusion, clarification should be added in documentation (in addition to what is written in manuscript detailing new version ).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants