Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The PCK under reprojection for horse #4

Closed
linpeisensh opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

The PCK under reprojection for horse #4

linpeisensh opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@linpeisensh
Copy link

linpeisensh commented Aug 2, 2020

Thank you for your excellent work!

I have run your acsm code and found the PCK under reprojection for horse is much smaller than you show in your paper. The PCK transfer is fine.
image
as you can see in the following picture, the predict key points are not so close to the ground truth.
0075_img_kp
0075_img_kp_project
I have run this to test:
python -m acsm.benchmark.pascal.kp_project --name=acsm_horse_8parts --category=horse --parts_file=acsm/part_files/horse.txt --use_html --dl_out_pascal=True --dl_out_imnet=False --split=val --num_train_epoch=400 --num_hypo_cams=8 --env_name=acsm_horse_8parts_pck_val --multiple_cam=True --visuals_freq=5 --visualize=True --n_data_workers=4 --scale_bias=0.75 --resnet_style_decoder=True --resnet_blocks=4
Have I done something wrong?

@nileshkulkarni
Copy link
Owner

nileshkulkarni commented Aug 3, 2020

Hi @linpeisensh,

I think the command is missing two parameters --el_euler_range=20 --cyc_euler_range=20 that is the reason I think the numbers are so low. Hope that fixes it. I will edit the command on the readme. Thanks for pointing out. Please refer to this commit

Best,
Nilesh

@linpeisensh
Copy link
Author

Thank you!

It works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants