-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Naming of html reports and aroma regressors #8
Comments
Hi @burdinskid13, thanks for your interest. I'll answer both here, but please open a separate bug report for the ICA AROMA one, and I'll copy my response over there. For the HTML report issue, I wonder if the quicker fix is running If that doesn't work/appeal, adding the session is possible. You would need to modify niworkflows here. We would need to accept a session and optionally add it to the filename. Then in fMRIPrep, we would need to detect that session has a unique value and pass that to niworkflows. Look for the function For the ICA AROMA regressor naming, to address this, we'll need to look at where they come from. Looks like the That's set here: So generated by: So we'll be looking in: Which calls: It looks like the metadata and columns are defined in two places: The fix may be simply to change |
Given that AROMA was removed in 23.1.0, are there any elements in this issue that should still be implemented? |
I think it can be closed. But worth opening on nipreps/fmripost-aroma... |
What would you like to see added in fMRIPrep?
html report naming:
For my use case, I need to run fmriprep on two sessions separately. i'd like to be able to merge the outputs into the same derivatives directory afterwards. however, since the html reports in the new layout (eg. in v22) are above the ses-* directory, i would need to rename the html reports in order to not have two files named the same in the same location. it would be great if the html report naming could include ses-* in addition to sub-*.
ICA aroma regressor naming:
I noticed that the naming of ICA aroma regressors in *_desc-confounds_timeseries.json and *_desc-confounds_timeseries.tsv is inconsistent. Naming the two regressors the same would make workflows just a little smoother. For example, the first motion regressor in the json is called "aroma_motion_1" but in the tsv it's called " aroma_motion_01". i got this with v22.0.2.
Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?
Yes, but I would need guidance
Additional information / screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: