Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Travis CI: Abuse detected #1494

Closed
nnposter opened this issue Feb 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Travis CI: Abuse detected #1494

nnposter opened this issue Feb 23, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@nnposter
Copy link

Travis CI is refusing to build nmap as new commits propagate from SVN to GitHub. The specific result is Job rejected with Abuse detected.

https://travis-ci.org/nmap/nmap/requests

Judging by build history, this issue might have first occurred on or after August 14, 2018.

https://travis-ci.org/nmap/nmap/builds

@dmiller-nmap
Copy link

I'll try to contact @travis-ci support to see if they can clue us in to why it's being flagged. Looks like they don't publicly disclose the kinds of things that trip their abuse sensors.

Unlikely to be related, but if you are making commits that don't contain things that affect the build (documentation changes, comments, etc), you can put [ci skip] in the commit message to skip the build. I hardly ever remember to do this, but it's probably a good idea to be courteous, since we're taking advantage of their free-for-open-source service.

@nnposter
Copy link
Author

Am I correct that there is no value in invoking Travis if the commit is limited to nselib and/or scripts?

As an example, I have not noticed that luac -p gets called to assure basic syntax correctness. On the other hand, is that something that would be useful to start doing?

@fyodor
Copy link
Member

fyodor commented Jan 8, 2024

I'm closing this since we have opened Issue #2768 for fixing Travis and/or migrating to a new CI/Testing system.

@fyodor fyodor closed this as completed Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants