New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing without Masks #4
Comments
You can run 'python train_test_eval.py --Training False --Testing True --Evaluation False' to predict the masks only from test images. |
Thank you for the quick reply! and I do apologize for a follow up, when attempting to run that code with only the image in the test folder and no matching mask in the mask folder this is the error it throws:
I am hoping to find a way to remove that dependency, as I don't have the mask for the image I wish to test. Possible? |
Actually, follow on, adding the training flag to that string causes this error, removing it causes the error in the first comment. Including the flag gets this error, which makes sense, I don't have any images in the training folders.
|
Annnnnnnd you can just ignore, and i'll close this. It appears only having !python train_test_eval.py --Testing True, works. including any of the other flags causes weirdness. All good! |
Hello! And thank you for this latest work. I do apologize for this question if there is an easy answer that I have missed in the code. The inclusion of the evaluator is super helpful, but was curious if it was possible to amend the code to allow for testing when I do not have a mask of the image I wish to test, only the image, and still output the predicted mask?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: