Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test NEMS workflow with v55 adcirc for ATL+PR 120 m mesh for the stroms #39

Closed
saeed-moghimi-noaa opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 11 comments

Comments

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned to @ps2epsi

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @mtcontre and @WPringle
Where we can get the ATL+PR 120 m mesh NAVD88 +10 m mesh?
Thanks,
-Saeed

@mtcontre
Copy link

mtcontre commented Jun 2, 2021

Hi Saeed,
Can you please check this mesh:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WZm30VWkbsINHslfV7qFIaHhUqHUF7Fm?usp=sharing

It is EC+PR, but I'm not sure if it is clipped to 6 or 10 m. Otherwise, the last release that we used for GESTOFS is in the following link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1yQLhdzDDqWMftm2H3GQlKRQI8-86BfbG?usp=sharing
However, that mesh doesn't have the insert in PR.
Best!

@mtcontre
Copy link

mtcontre commented Jun 2, 2021

Hi Saeed,
Can you please check this mesh:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WZm30VWkbsINHslfV7qFIaHhUqHUF7Fm?usp=sharing

It is EC+PR, but I'm not sure if it is clipped to 6 or 10 m. Otherwise, the last release that we used for GESTOFS is in the following link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1yQLhdzDDqWMftm2H3GQlKRQI8-86BfbG?usp=sharing
However, that mesh doesn't have the insert in PR.
Best!

So the first link has the EC mesh up to 10 m. It needs the insert in PR.
Best!

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks All.

@mtcontre
Please share the latest 120 m with 10m above NAVD88 with William for inclusion of PR. Please make sure it is with +10m
land elevation.

@WPringle
Please send the final PAC and ATL+PR meshes to @JaimeCalzadaNOAA for testing.

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

saeed-moghimi-noaa commented Jun 8, 2021

Hi Yuji @ps2epsi
You should be able to run the previous HWRF in ATL through cap.  The Cap will read the ATM data and interpolation should happen on the fly. You just need to create a new:

https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NSEM-workflow/blob/master/parm/nems.configure.atm_ocn_wav_1loop.IN
file and edit the time loop part to:

runSeq::
  @$_coupling_interval_sec_
    ATM -> OCN   
    WAV -> OCN   :remapMethod=redist
    ATM -> WAV   
    OCN -> WAV   :remapMethod=redist
    ATM
    OCN
    WAV
  @
::

@ps2epsi
Copy link

ps2epsi commented Jun 10, 2021 via email

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

saeed-moghimi-noaa commented Jun 10, 2021

Hi Yuji @ps2epsi

Please see the NUOPC manual here:
https://earthsystemmodeling.org/docs/nightly/develop/NUOPC_refdoc/node3.html#SECTION00033400000000000000

image

you can use redist only if the mesh on both side are the same. In this case HWRF is interpolated on the old HSOFS and OCN is on the 120m new ATL mesh. Therefore you need to change the remapmethod.

I suggest to go with bilinear or one of the nearest (I do not know the difference) please look into the manual.

As I mentioned in the issue above you need to create a new:

https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/NSEM-workflow/blob/master/parm/nems.configure.atm_ocn_wav_1loop.IN

and make these changes:

runSeq::
  @$_coupling_interval_sec_
    ATM -> OCN   :remapMethod=bilinear
    WAV -> OCN   :remapMethod=redist
    ATM -> WAV   :remapMethod=bilinear
    OCN -> WAV   :remapMethod=redist
    ATM
    OCN
    WAV
  @
::

Thanks,
-Saeed

@ps2epsi
Copy link

ps2epsi commented Jun 10, 2021 via email

@ps2epsi
Copy link

ps2epsi commented Jun 16, 2021

I've tested all of remapMethod, and here is my recommendation based on simulation runtime.

  1. redist
  2. nearest_stod
  3. bilinear
  4. patch and nearest_dtos
  5. conserve
    "redist" is the fastest. "nearest_stod" is the best method if "redist" isn't available. "bilinear" works fine, but it's not good for high resolution model grid because runtime depends on grid number. "patch and nearest_dtos" is the same as "bilinear", but they are slower than "bilinear". "conserve" didn't work for this time.

@saeed-moghimi-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Harvey and Maria run finished for

ATM -> ADC
ATM + WW3 -> ADC

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants