Incorrect verbs when generating recordings

[andrerod]

Right now recordings generate code that, among other things, include a builder pattern with a function that is named after the HTTP verb. The problem is that the scope may not support that verb.

E.g.:

nock('http://ciserversdk.table.core.windows.net:80')
.filteringRequestBody(function (path) { return '';})
.merge('/tableservice12(PartitionKey=%27part1%27,RowKey=%27row1%27)', '')
.reply(204, "", { 'cache-control': 'no-cache',
'content-length': '0',
date: 'Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:30:56 GMT' });

A better solution would be to generate (at least for the ones that are not trivial / supported) the recordings with a generic http verb processing mechanism.

Example:

.request('merge', 'tableservice12' foobar)
.reply(foobar)

[pgte]

Closing this one, if this is still an issue please reopen.
Thanks!

[lock]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue and add a reference to this one if it’s related. Thank you!