Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add getObjectUrl alias to generateObjectUrl #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2023

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Oct 7, 2023

No description provided.

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member Author

fengmk2 commented Oct 7, 2023

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #15 (9c93ac8) into master (5a0eb01) will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 71.42%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #15      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.40%   94.32%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        1860     1867       +7     
  Branches      280      280              
==========================================
+ Hits         1756     1761       +5     
- Misses        104      106       +2     
Files Coverage Δ
src/OSSObject.ts 94.57% <71.42%> (-0.17%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 0cfa089 into master Oct 7, 2023
4 of 6 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the add-getObjectUrl branch October 7, 2023 10:32
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
[skip ci]

## [2.0.1](v2.0.0...v2.0.1) (2023-10-07)

### Bug Fixes

* add getObjectUrl alias to generateObjectUrl ([#15](#15)) ([0cfa089](0cfa089))
fengmk2 added a commit to cnpm/cnpmcore that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
fengmk2 added a commit to cnpm/cnpmcore that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant