Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
worker: add hasRef() to MessagePort
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Since we were removing the hasRef() method before exposing the
MessagePort object, the only way of knowing if the handle was keeping
the event loop active was to parse the string returned by
util.inspect(port), which is inconvenient and inconsistent with most of
the other async resources. So this change stops removing hasRef() from
the MessagePort prototype. The reason why this is also being documented
is that while reporting active resources, async_hooks returns the same
MessagePort object as the one that is accessible by users.

Refs: #42091 (comment)
Signed-off-by: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>

PR-URL: #42849
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
  • Loading branch information
RaisinTen authored and juanarbol committed May 31, 2022
1 parent 1612c35 commit e0807fd
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 120 additions and 3 deletions.
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions doc/api/worker_threads.md
Expand Up @@ -757,6 +757,18 @@ port2.postMessage(new URL('https://example.org'));
// Prints: { }
```

### `port.hasRef()`

<!-- YAML
added: REPLACEME
-->

> Stability: 1 - Experimental
* Returns: {boolean}

If true, the `MessagePort` object will keep the Node.js event loop active.

### `port.ref()`

<!-- YAML
Expand Down
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion lib/internal/worker/io.js
Expand Up @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ const messageTypes = {
// We have to mess with the MessagePort prototype a bit, so that a) we can make
// it inherit from NodeEventTarget, even though it is a C++ class, and b) we do
// not provide methods that are not present in the Browser and not documented
// on our side (e.g. hasRef).
// on our side (e.g. stopMessagePort).
// Save a copy of the original set of methods as a shallow clone.
const MessagePortPrototype = ObjectCreate(
ObjectGetPrototypeOf(MessagePort.prototype),
Expand All @@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ ObjectSetPrototypeOf(MessagePort.prototype, NodeEventTarget.prototype);
// changing the prototype of MessagePort.prototype implicitly removed them.
MessagePort.prototype.ref = MessagePortPrototype.ref;
MessagePort.prototype.unref = MessagePortPrototype.unref;
MessagePort.prototype.hasRef = function() {
return !!FunctionPrototypeCall(MessagePortPrototype.hasRef, this);
};

function validateMessagePort(port, name) {
if (!checkMessagePort(port))
Expand Down
57 changes: 57 additions & 0 deletions test/parallel/test-messageport-hasref.js
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
'use strict';
const common = require('../common');

const { MessageChannel } = require('worker_threads');
const { createHook } = require('async_hooks');
const { strictEqual } = require('assert');

const handles = [];

createHook({
init(asyncId, type, triggerAsyncId, resource) {
if (type === 'MESSAGEPORT') {
handles.push(resource);
}
}
}).enable();

const { port1, port2 } = new MessageChannel();
strictEqual(handles[0], port1);
strictEqual(handles[1], port2);

strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), false);
strictEqual(handles[1].hasRef(), false);

port1.unref();
strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), false);

port1.ref();
strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), true);

port1.unref();
strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), false);

port1.on('message', () => {});
strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), true);

port2.unref();
strictEqual(handles[1].hasRef(), false);

port2.ref();
strictEqual(handles[1].hasRef(), true);

port2.unref();
strictEqual(handles[1].hasRef(), false);

port2.on('message', () => {});
strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), true);

port1.on('close', common.mustCall(() => {
strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), false);
strictEqual(handles[1].hasRef(), false);
}));

port2.close();

strictEqual(handles[0].hasRef(), true);
strictEqual(handles[1].hasRef(), true);
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions test/parallel/test-worker-message-port.js
Expand Up @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ const { MessageChannel, MessagePort } = require('worker_threads');
assert.deepStrictEqual(
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(MessagePort.prototype).sort(),
[
'close', 'constructor', 'onmessage', 'onmessageerror', 'postMessage',
'ref', 'start', 'unref',
'close', 'constructor', 'hasRef', 'onmessage', 'onmessageerror',
'postMessage', 'ref', 'start', 'unref',
]);
}
45 changes: 45 additions & 0 deletions test/parallel/test-worker-messageport-hasref.js
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
'use strict';
const common = require('../common');

const { Worker } = require('worker_threads');
const { createHook } = require('async_hooks');
const { deepStrictEqual, strictEqual } = require('assert');

const m = new Map();
createHook({
init(asyncId, type, triggerAsyncId, resource) {
if (['WORKER', 'MESSAGEPORT'].includes(type)) {
m.set(asyncId, { type, resource });
}
},
destroy(asyncId) {
m.delete(asyncId);
}
}).enable();

function getActiveWorkerAndMessagePortTypes() {
const activeWorkerAndMessagePortTypes = [];
for (const asyncId of m.keys()) {
const { type, resource } = m.get(asyncId);
// Same logic as https://github.com/mafintosh/why-is-node-running/blob/24fb4c878753390a05d00959e6173d0d3c31fddd/index.js#L31-L32.
if (typeof resource.hasRef !== 'function' || resource.hasRef() === true) {
activeWorkerAndMessagePortTypes.push(type);
}
}
return activeWorkerAndMessagePortTypes;
}

const w = new Worker('', { eval: true });
deepStrictEqual(getActiveWorkerAndMessagePortTypes(), ['WORKER']);
w.unref();
deepStrictEqual(getActiveWorkerAndMessagePortTypes(), []);
w.ref();
deepStrictEqual(getActiveWorkerAndMessagePortTypes(), ['WORKER', 'MESSAGEPORT']);

w.on('exit', common.mustCall((exitCode) => {
strictEqual(exitCode, 0);
deepStrictEqual(getActiveWorkerAndMessagePortTypes(), ['WORKER']);
setTimeout(common.mustCall(() => {
deepStrictEqual(getActiveWorkerAndMessagePortTypes(), []);
}), 0);
}));

0 comments on commit e0807fd

Please sign in to comment.