Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start node in inspect mode will cause CPU consumption 100% #25077

Closed
wu-jingtao opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Start node in inspect mode will cause CPU consumption 100% #25077

wu-jingtao opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@wu-jingtao
Copy link

  • docker:10-stretch
  • Host computer:Linux test 4.4.0-137-generic io.js TC Meeting 2014-12-17 #163-Ubuntu SMP Mon Sep 24 13:14:43 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I find when using child_process.fork to spawn the third layer child process with the debugger mode will cause CPU consumption to 100%,this problem will keep until you use a debugger tool ( like chrome debugger tool ) to connect it. after connected, the CPU consumption will soon drow back to normal status.

I`m sure this is not my code`s problem, and I`ve tried in my notebook and cloud server, this problem will always occur.

Process tree:

node .
    └  /usr/local/bin/node /app/subprocess.js
         └  /usr/local/bin/node --inspect-brk=127.0.0.1:6060 /app/third.js

Main process code:

child_process.fork(path.resolve(__dirname, './subprocess.js'))

Subprocess code:

 const child = child_process.fork(taskFilePath, [], {
     cwd: FilePath._programDataDir,
     execArgv: debug ? [`--inspect-brk=127.0.0.1:${debugPort}`] : [],
     stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe', 'ipc']
});
@joshuakb2
Copy link

I also experience this problem pretty much every day. My laptop fan gets really loud so it's impossible to miss. Every time I start a process with --inspect-brk, CPU usage goes to 100%, regardless of whether or not I am launching a subprocess.

I'm using Node version 12.2.0.

@alexkozy
Copy link
Member

cc @eugeneo

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jul 21, 2019

Should have been fixed by #28756

@targos targos closed this as completed Jul 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants