Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unable to connect to 802.11n only ap #3017

Closed
532910 opened this issue Jan 25, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

unable to connect to 802.11n only ap #3017

532910 opened this issue Jan 25, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@532910
Copy link
Contributor

532910 commented Jan 25, 2020

  1. I've just switched my APs to 802.11n only mode. (option require_mode 'n' in openwrt)
  2. An old NodeMCU 2.2.0.0 works fine.
  3. Fresh NodeMCU 3.0.0.0 unables to connect. AP says: Station does not support mandatory HT PHY - reject association enven with wifi.setphymode(wifi.PHYMODE_N)
@532910
Copy link
Contributor Author

532910 commented Jan 25, 2020

It's due to espressif / ESP8266_NONOS_SDK
v3.0.2 works fine
please update

@nwf
Copy link
Member

nwf commented Feb 2, 2020

You are welcome to open a PR to bump our sdk version.

@marcelstoer
Copy link
Member

In which case #3008 would become obsolete.

@532910
Copy link
Contributor Author

532910 commented Feb 9, 2020

You are welcome to open a PR to bump our sdk version.

As soon as I'll understand what was technically wrong with #3026

@532910
Copy link
Contributor Author

532910 commented Feb 9, 2020

Which part of

ifeq ("$(RELEASE)","latest-3.0")
SDK_VER := 3.0.0
SDK_FILE_SHA1 := NA
SDK_ZIP_ROOT := ESP8266_NONOS_SDK-release-v$(SDK_VER)
SDK_FILE_VER := release/v$(SDK_VER)
else ifeq ("$(RELEASE)","master")
SDK_VER := master
SDK_FILE_SHA1 := NA
SDK_ZIP_ROOT := ESP8266_NONOS_SDK-$(SDK_VER)
SDK_FILE_VER := $(SDK_VER)
else
# SDK_VER := 3.0
# SDK_FILE_VER := v$(SDK_VER)
SDK_FILE_VER := e4434aa730e78c63040ace360493aef420ec267c
SDK_VER := 3.0-e4434aa
SDK_FILE_SHA1 := ac6528a6a206d3d4c220e4035ced423eb314cfbf
SDK_ZIP_ROOT := ESP8266_NONOS_SDK-$(SDK_FILE_VER)
endif

should be updated, the first or the last one?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 7, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Feb 7, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants