Coveralls Github Action

[helio-frota]

I think we have some others repositories using local coveralls instead of coveralls github action.

It would be good for us to follow this approach nodeshift/npcheck#55

[richardlau]

Yep, we currently have three repositories in this org using the Coveralls module: https://github.com/search?q=org%3Anodeshift+coveralls.js&type=code
I can probably make a start converting those tomorrow.

[richardlau]

• opossum-prometheus chore: use Coveralls action opossum-prometheus#53
• license-reporter chore: use Coveralls action nodeshift-archived/license-reporter#389
• oratrix chore: use Coveralls action nodeshift-archived/oratrix#99

[helio-frota]

• nodejs-rest-http chore: update dependencies and github action nodeshift-starters/nodejs-rest-http#210
• chore: general updates nodeshift-starters/nodejs-health-check#224
• chore: general updates nodeshift-starters/nodejs-configmap#195
• chore: general updates nodeshift-starters/nodejs-rest-http-crud#243

[richardlau]

FYI I came across lemurheavy/coveralls-public#1531 which is why I think we have coverage failures using the action -- there's a bug on Coveralls' end where if no thresholds are set no change (i.e. 0%) is being flagged as failing.

[helio-frota]

so probably we need to set that in coveralls for each repo right?

[richardlau]

I think so. Did we make a decision on sensible thresholds? (both overall and % decrease)?

[helio-frota]

not yet, I think that will be part of ref-arch

[helio-frota]

I think we have done with this also.
in the case of travis and some repos with no CI, please take a look on other discussion thread #8