New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reproducing LangevinVAE result in Table 3 #1
Comments
Just spoke with Hao Wu who wrote this code, it's a result of occasional bad proposal step. He will look into details and revise it. Thanks for bringing it up. |
Thanks for your timely response. But according to the paper the mean and covariance of LangevinVAE looks not so bad, not sure it is occasional bad proposal step. I try different random seed, and all reports NLL around 200. Thanks for you again your insightful paper, it is really a nice work. |
@franknoe |
thank you! Could you send a PR? |
Hi there, I’m just following the bread crumbs on this and I’m a bit confused as to the status of the Langevin VAE result in Table 3. Is the result in the paper correct? How should I reproduce it, please? Thanks |
Thanks for your insightful paper and sharing code.
I run your shared code on experiment 4 MNIST, I can reproduce results claimed in Table 3 except LangevinVAE. It reported NLL around 200 in multiple runs.
I notice there could be a bug in your code, the line misses
y
in callinginterpolated_force
. But the results didn't change even I changed toThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: