Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison isnt accurate #49

Open
Enelar opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Comparison isnt accurate #49

Enelar opened this issue Apr 10, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@Enelar
Copy link

Enelar commented Apr 10, 2018

JPEG is outdated. And its out of the league. Same with GIF.
Since you suggest new format, that not yet fully supported you have to compare with competitive alternatives:

  • JPEG2000
  • WebP
  • FLIF (+ animation)
  • WebM (animation)
  • MP4 (animation)

Look what google did: https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study?csw=1
Use PSNR / SSIM

Dont get me wrong, you publish closed source codec, compare it to previous century technologies, and expect we would adapt it. No way. x265 is great since it has intel(and probably amd) cores support, but. but. It weren't adopted by any browser, nor would be adopted(except probably Safari, cause they don't mind closed source). Meanwhile almost every end-user app nowdays either hybrid or pure web.
On other hand we have WebP, which already implemented in Chrome&Opera&Android + UC (74% of world traffic consumers), and on his way in Firefox&Safari team.

If you really want your work to be worthy, you have to put some effort to it. We have tens of image format alternatives, same as with compression algorithms.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant