Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make 'virtual' compatible with 'Cards Effect' #7159

Closed
3 of 4 tasks
MagnusBrzenk opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
3 of 4 tasks

Make 'virtual' compatible with 'Cards Effect' #7159

MagnusBrzenk opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@MagnusBrzenk
Copy link

Clear and concise description of the problem

At the moment, if you apply the cards effect AND the virtual property, then the cards-effect CSS gets messed up. Would be nice to have a very large/dynamic pack of cards. Thanks.

Suggested solution

Might be an easy CSS clash/fix. Dunno.

Alternative

No response

Additional context

No response

Validations

  • Follow our Code of Conduct
  • Read the docs.
  • Check that there isn't already an issue that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.

Would you like to open a PR for this feature?

  • I'm willing to open a PR
@nolimits4web
Copy link
Owner

nolimits4web commented Nov 2, 2023

World be good to see how it doesn't work with the example at first, and if it doesn't then issue should be created

@MagnusBrzenk
Copy link
Author

Here's an example.

If you comment-out "virtual" and "Virtual", and keep the number of cards small (<100), then it works great. If you increase the cards to e.g. 1000, then animation slows down. If you add in "virtual" and "Virtual", then performance returns, but there is a CSS flicker as you drag and let go. (Also, you get an occasional glitch whereby the whole pack shifts, but that is rare, and I dont know what triggers that.

@leeeisok
Copy link

leeeisok commented Dec 9, 2023

@MagnusBrzenk
hi, magnusbrzenk
I have also encountered this problem. Have you currently resolved it? Or are there any other solutions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants