Strange wording?

[rolfschr]

I think the phrase "With (>>=), you choose which action to do as the second argument based on the return value of the action of the first argument." is not as intended. Section 6.7

[nomeata]

Hmm, probably not the best phrased sentence, but I do mean what I wrote there. Do you have a suggestion for a better phrasing?

[rolfschr]

Mh, I didn't propose anything initially because I didn't have a good wording neither ;) Maybe this:

In contrast to (<*>), (>>=)'s second argument is not a predetermined action but a function that yields one - given the result from the first action.

? Nevermind.