Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maps missing nek forest #61

Open
dylanh724 opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Maps missing nek forest #61

dylanh724 opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
await-user-response The issue is ready to be closed, pending the user response/confirmation.

Comments

@dylanh724
Copy link

dylanh724 commented Mar 17, 2023

image

Edit: While there, may as well fix that Nagafen'S with the capital S

@weteamsteve
Copy link

weteamsteve commented Mar 17, 2023

image

image

It is under "The Nektulos Forest"

To be clear, pretty sure this isn't an application issue, it is the way the maps were named way back then and/or the file names

@dylanh724
Copy link
Author

Oh man. Can we change just the label? I don't think anyone would guess that one. Even if you /who, it's just Nektulos Forest

@weteamsteve
Copy link

You can fork the repository and create a switch and put manual labels in for each map I guess, and make sure it loads the correct map name manually

@rm-you
Copy link
Collaborator

rm-you commented Apr 15, 2024

I've considered doing a bunch of alias stuff like this, but you should almost never need to manually select the map anymore -- if you just do a /who command it will update your active map to your current zone.

@rm-you rm-you added the await-user-response The issue is ready to be closed, pending the user response/confirmation. label Apr 15, 2024
@dylanh724 dylanh724 removed their assignment Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
await-user-response The issue is ready to be closed, pending the user response/confirmation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants