DisplayImageOptions --> inPurgeable

[siyamed]

Dont you think it would be good to support inPurgable for 2.x devices ?

In this case adding the field in DisplayImageOptions, would use the flag to construct BitmapFactory.Options.

I have checked Stackoverflow and issues in here, couldn't find any comments of yours about it. Since my knowledge on that field is not that deep, and I find UIL very professional I want to ask if there is a reason for you not to put it there?

[nostra13]

No, there is no any reason. Some time ago I was thinking about it but I wasn't sure this option doesn't harm the lib. I wanted to investigate this option later but then probably forgot about it.

Now I still not sure inPurgeable will be useful for UIL but I think it won't harm the library.

[nostra13]

I will add inPurgeable using by default in next lib version.

[virusman]

inPurgeable only works with decodeByteArray. Since UIL is loading images from a stream, inPurgeable does nothing.
Is it possible to add support for decodeByteArray? Read the file to a temporary byte array and decode that.

[nostra13]

Right you are. But maybe someone will override ImageDecoder...