You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The above is copied exactly as "line sorted as integers ascending" by Notepad++ v8.4.5 (and 8.4.6).
Expected Behavior
I expected dashes to be treated as delimiter, not as minus sign.
I think it worked like I expected in some previous versions.
Although probably that was a bug, as I see from searching around.
I also want to suggest that if there is any count of dashes between numbers and nothing else, e.g. "1-------------2", then the following number should not be treated as negative.
Actual Behavior
Minux-prefixed parts are treated as negative, with nothing between the minus and the previous number.
P.S. Anyway, this is a minor issue for me, as I only wanted to group together duplicate prefixes, and any order works for that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That Notepad++ does anything at all with your sample lines is a miracle, as your lines do not begin with integers, so the root of this complaint is a PBKAC.
It is also an invalid issue because it did not populate the requested Debug Info from the issue template.
Description of the Issue
I encountered this issue while sorting a list of locations from "Space Engine" program, which include formats like the following:
The above is copied exactly as "line sorted as integers ascending" by Notepad++ v8.4.5 (and 8.4.6).
Expected Behavior
I expected dashes to be treated as delimiter, not as minus sign.
I think it worked like I expected in some previous versions.
Although probably that was a bug, as I see from searching around.
I also want to suggest that if there is any count of dashes between numbers and nothing else, e.g. "1-------------2", then the following number should not be treated as negative.
Actual Behavior
Minux-prefixed parts are treated as negative, with nothing between the minus and the previous number.
P.S. Anyway, this is a minor issue for me, as I only wanted to group together duplicate prefixes, and any order works for that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: