Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noto Sans Arabic: Wrong ligatures in Uyghur text #69

Closed
Buernia opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Noto Sans Arabic: Wrong ligatures in Uyghur text #69

Buernia opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Buernia
Copy link

Buernia commented Dec 20, 2017

Font

Noto Sans Arabic

Where the font came from, and when

Site: https://noto-website-2.storage.googleapis.com/pkgs/Noto-hinted.zip
Date: 2017-12-19

Font Version

Version 2.0000

Issue

Some ligatures in Uyghur text is wrong, for example, چە (che) in ئۇيغۇرچە (uyghurche), ھە (he) in ھەر (her), گە (ge) in گەۋدىلىك (gewdilik).

Image

Sample image

@marekjez86
Copy link

@Buernia : thank you I'll investigate it (and thank you for providing the text). Please let me know if you see any other issues.

@KrasnayaPloshchad
Copy link

Both ە, چ, ھ ,گ has an entry for joining, you just add rules to make their contextual forms works as expected.

@nizarsq
Copy link

nizarsq commented May 30, 2020

This issue fixed for NotoSansArabic
Screen Shot 2020-05-30 at 12 39 35 PM

@nizarsq nizarsq closed this as completed May 30, 2020
@nizarsq nizarsq reopened this May 30, 2020
@nizarsq
Copy link

nizarsq commented May 30, 2020

This issue fixed on unhinted font, on hinted font still reproducible.
Screen Shot 2020-05-30 at 12 49 05 PM
Screen Shot 2020-05-30 at 12 49 29 PM

@nizarsq
Copy link

nizarsq commented Nov 12, 2020

Issue fixed.

@nizarsq nizarsq closed this as completed Nov 12, 2020
@simoncozens simoncozens transferred this issue from notofonts/noto-fonts Jul 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants