Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typicon support #58

Open
dscorbett opened this issue Aug 16, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Typicon support #58

dscorbett opened this issue Aug 16, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@dscorbett
Copy link

Font

NotoMono-Regular.otf
NotoSans-Regular.ttf
NotoSerif-Regular.ttf

Where the font came from, and when

Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/bf20559450ec75aec7a646b208343540a4496262/phaseIII_only/unhinted/otf/NotoMono/NotoMono-Regular.otf
Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/bf20559450ec75aec7a646b208343540a4496262/phaseIII_only/hinted/ttf/NotoSans/NotoSans-Regular.ttf
Site: https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/blob/bf20559450ec75aec7a646b208343540a4496262/phaseIII_only/hinted/ttf/NotoSerif/NotoSerif-Regular.ttf
Date: 2020-08-01

Font version

Noto Mono: Version 2.004
Noto Sans: Version 2.003; ttfautohint (v1.8.2)
Noto Serif: Version 2.003; ttfautohint (v1.8.2)

Issue

The LGC fonts should support U+29DF DOUBLE-ENDED MULTIMAP. According to Unicode Technical Note notofonts/noto-fonts#41, U+29DF is used as a typicon symbol. It may be the base for combining typicon marks; e.g. ⟨⧟꙼̇⟩ for June 11 (а҃і), ⟨⧟꙼⟩ for July 7 (з҃), and ⟨⧟᷹⟩ for August 25 (к҃є). For such combinations to work, the base and the mark must be in the same font.

Character data

⧟꙼
U+29DF DOUBLE-ENDED MULTIMAP
U+A67C COMBINING CYRILLIC KAVYKA

Screenshot

⧟꙼⧟꙼⧟꙼

@simoncozens
Copy link
Contributor

Continuing from notofonts/symbols#24, it looks like supporting typicon properly (in Sans) would mean:

@simoncozens simoncozens changed the title LGC fonts lack U+29DF DOUBLE-ENDED MULTIMAP Typicon support Apr 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants