Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Line color should vary by performance #254

Closed
hazelshapiro opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #282
Closed

Line color should vary by performance #254

hazelshapiro opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #282
Labels
enhancement New feature or request impact/ui Impacts the the user interface

Comments

@hazelshapiro
Copy link
Collaborator

hazelshapiro commented Jan 24, 2024

Right now just the object box colors change with performance, but the performance should be reflected in the line color. Related #189

image

Here the line between SSMI/I-SSMIS and Sea Ice Age should reflect the performance score of "7" (brown -- very low on a scale of 0-100). The line between the SSMI/I-SSMIS and Sea Ice Concentration should reflect the performance score of "50" (orange -- medium performance). The SSMI/I-SSMIS object should be a weighted average performance score.

The color of the Sea Ice Age and Sea Ice Concentration boxes is defined by how well those data products support the relevant application. See math here:

image

image

@hazelshapiro hazelshapiro added this to the 0 - Bug fixes milestone Jan 24, 2024
@mfisher87 mfisher87 added enhancement New feature or request impact/ui Impacts the the user interface labels Feb 29, 2024
@mfisher87
Copy link
Member

The box colors are actually random because we haven't implemented this feature, so I moved this from the "bug fixes" milestone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request impact/ui Impacts the the user interface
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants