Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ability to configure via OVF #41

Open
rylarson opened this issue Mar 11, 2014 · 6 comments
Open

Add ability to configure via OVF #41

rylarson opened this issue Mar 11, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

@rylarson
Copy link
Contributor

RBvomi supports importing an OVF. It would be awesome if we could package vsphere boxes as a tar with an OVF and if no template is specified, use the OVF packaged in the box file.

The template having to be in vsphere already is not conducive to treating the box files like individual artifacts.

@rylarson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looking at the rbvmomi code, this will probably require an rbvmomi change as well. It appears rbvmomi expects a url for curl to download and then pipes that into a curl upload. For this to be useful for a box file, rbvmomi need to accept a uri to a local package (the OVF contained in the box file).

@GregDomjan
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@RoadRunnr
Copy link

+1

It appears as if rbvmomi is able to handle file:// URL's for local files just fine (tested with curl 7.37.1). rbvmomi also seems to support this (see OvfManager.rb Line 105 ).

So, actually deploying OVF and OVA images should be doable.

@rylarson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Revisiting this because I have been messing around a lot with ovftool. What do you think about changing the vsphere provider box file format to optionally package an OVA or OVF.

If an OVA/OVF was present in the box file, the plugin could deploy the OVA/OVF to the vcenter server as the named VM as configured in the Vagrantfile.

Thoughts?

@mkuzmin
Copy link
Contributor

mkuzmin commented Jan 24, 2015

Also look at vagrant-vcenter plugin.

@kubrat
Copy link

kubrat commented Feb 1, 2018

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants