Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Meta] Naming conventions for LS, CD and PWD structs #1131

Closed
quebin31 opened this issue Dec 27, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1133
Closed

[Meta] Naming conventions for LS, CD and PWD structs #1131

quebin31 opened this issue Dec 27, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1133

Comments

@quebin31
Copy link
Contributor

Why the structs for the commands ls, cd and pwd aren't following naming conventions?
They are LS, CD and PWD; instead of Ls, Cd and Pwd.
@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

We can fix this. I think they are just older commands

@quebin31
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can help with that

@quebin31 quebin31 mentioned this issue Dec 28, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Refactor struct names for old commands (ls, cd, pwd)
2 participants
@sophiajt @quebin31