Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could this work with the new Build Output API? #730

Closed
bokub opened this issue Nov 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Could this work with the new Build Output API? #730

bokub opened this issue Nov 5, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@bokub
Copy link

bokub commented Nov 5, 2022

Can this builder work with the new Build Output API?

If yes, I think it would be a good idea to add an example configuration in the README

Copy link
Member

I would advise you use either Nuxt Bridge or Nuxt 3, each of which comes with first-class support for Vercel's Build Output API, as well as a much smaller function size.

@bokub
Copy link
Author

bokub commented Nov 6, 2022

OK I'll try that, thank you! 👍

@bokub
Copy link
Author

bokub commented Nov 8, 2022

Hi Daniel,

I tested Nuxt 3 with Vercel. It's really fast and easy to configure, but it looks like on-demand static generation is still in progress (see screenshot below). Do you have any idea if it can be configured manually ? If no, do you know when we can expect it to become available ?

Thank you !!

image

@danielroe
Copy link
Member

You can follow this: unjs/nitro#545. We're just waiting for an upstream bug to be fixed before we can merge it.

@leerob
Copy link

leerob commented Jan 10, 2023

I think we can probably close this out, unless you are thinking you'll update Nuxt 2 to add support here?

@danielroe danielroe closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants