fix(concealer): more precise anticonceal feature detection

[champignoom]

The previous version comparison logic seems flawed: (0,10,0) should be greater than (0,7,1), not less.

To ensure that anticonceal is available, it's not enough to only check version being 0.10.0. We must also ensure that the subversion (the number after '-') is greater than 575 or something iirc.

[vhyrro]

I feel like this could be done much cleaner with the modern vim.version() and vim.version.parse() APIs, would be much more performant too :D
It allows for checking if it's a development (nightly) build alongside a specific revision where we could test for anticonceal specifically. Thoughts?

[champignoom]

That would be great but I in the result of vim.version() I can't find the 1031 part of NVIM v0.10.0-dev-1031+gc431d820e.

[max397574]

it has the __lt field in the metatable
I'll take a look at the source to see if we can use that

looks like this doesn't check the specific commits

[vhyrro]

That kinda sucks - given that we check for the current nvim version several times in the source code altogether I would prefer we do not parse strings on every iteration. Neorg is slow enough as it is 😆

Any alternate ideas perhaps?

[champignoom]

I think It will only be parsed once at startup.

[vhyrro]

Alright, that's not too bad then. I'll attach a TODO for the future to move this to vim.version() when 0.10 becomes the next stable