-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bad quality using official Neuralangelo compared to sdfstudio Implementation #25
Comments
Hi @xiemeilong Thanks for reporting this. This is indeed odd and unexpected. To narrow down the problem, could you help by providing the following information?
Thank you! |
Hi @xiemeilong, in addition to the above @mli0603 mentioned, we also have a fix (#41) on the scripts. If you were extracting the mesh from an earlier checkpoint, please pull again and let us know if the issue persists. Thanks! |
same poor mesh too |
@chenhsuanlin It still does not work with the latest code. preprocessing cmd in neuralangelo:
preprocessing cmd in sdfstudio:
train command in neuralangelo:
train command in sdfstudio, I am using the same test prompts as the author of sdfstudio, not the pure neuralangelo algorithm:
extract command in neuralangelo:
extract command in sdfstudio:
|
@xiemeilong @zz7379 we have pushed an update to |
@chenhsuanlin The latest version still doesn't work. |
@xiemeilong Hi :) Do you still have good results in Neuralangelo in sdfstudio and bad results in official Neuralangelo? |
@iam-machine I did not do any more testing. |
I obtained very good results using neuralangelo in sdfstudio, but for the same image data, the results obtained using the official neuralangelo implementation were like this.
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/2681638/260909507-396a1be7-b6b6-42a2-a52d-051a4f882040.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MjEyNTM1MTEsIm5iZiI6MTcyMTI1MzIxMSwicGF0aCI6Ii8yNjgxNjM4LzI2MDkwOTUwNy0zOTZhMWJlNy1iNmI2LTQyYTItYTUyZC0wNTFhNGY4ODIwNDAucG5nP1gtQW16LUFsZ29yaXRobT1BV1M0LUhNQUMtU0hBMjU2JlgtQW16LUNyZWRlbnRpYWw9QUtJQVZDT0RZTFNBNTNQUUs0WkElMkYyMDI0MDcxNyUyRnVzLWVhc3QtMSUyRnMzJTJGYXdzNF9yZXF1ZXN0JlgtQW16LURhdGU9MjAyNDA3MTdUMjE1MzMxWiZYLUFtei1FeHBpcmVzPTMwMCZYLUFtei1TaWduYXR1cmU9ZWVmOWU2ZTg4MjlkNGI2YzJmM2IxYmExMTY5YjEyNGZiYjMyNWZmODdhYjI2NzAwODZlYTg5ODBiN2FlNmYyNCZYLUFtei1TaWduZWRIZWFkZXJzPWhvc3QmYWN0b3JfaWQ9MCZrZXlfaWQ9MCZyZXBvX2lkPTAifQ.xsDGshDlUf0Dr5dZkDpVO1hApaYTL3G22Ot0xmQH5-U)
results using neuralangelo in sdfstudio
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/2681638/260910629-8d48ad3b-9d7c-479f-9d20-04855fb3734a.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.XXkzUOzwr3VHnrGvvJYdDv6AgZGNJP4Kfu1E7dBQHo8)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: