You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Comparing snapshots helps highlight jumps and dips in precision (or f(X)@10 depending on what you're measuring). However, the only proxy we have for "losing recall" (which tends to happen when you tune-up search precision), is the Results count from the current query.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to see the number of results returned from the snapshot alongside the number of results from the current query.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A more sophisticated recall-measurement solution. But do this hits-diff bit first!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @peterdm for this suggestion. This seems relatively doable.. I probably won't have time till next week to look on this, though a PR or a pointer on where to add this logic owuld be great ;-)
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Comparing snapshots helps highlight jumps and dips in precision (or
f(X)@10
depending on what you're measuring). However, the only proxy we have for "losing recall" (which tends to happen when you tune-up search precision), is theResults
count from the current query.Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to see the number of results returned from the snapshot alongside the number of results from the current query.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A more sophisticated recall-measurement solution. But do this hits-diff bit first!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: