Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tighten Timestamp Validation #42

Closed
varnerac opened this issue Dec 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Tighten Timestamp Validation #42

varnerac opened this issue Dec 14, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels
bug
Milestone
1.0

Comments

@varnerac
Copy link

The validation of timestamp literals should be tightened to ensure it meets the requirements in STIX 2.0 and the portion RFC 3339 it implements.

$ validate-patterns
Enter a pattern to validate: [x_whatever:detected == t'2457-73-22T32:81:84.1Z']

PASS: [x_whatever:detected == t'2457-73-22T32:81:84.1Z']
@gtback
Copy link
Contributor

gtback commented Jan 10, 2018

Thanks @varnerac and sorry for not seeing it right away. I'll hopefully have a chance to look into it soon.

@gtback
Copy link
Contributor

gtback commented Feb 26, 2018

This probably needs to be updated in the grammar and then incorporated here.

@gtback gtback added this to the 1.0 milestone Feb 26, 2018
This was referenced Mar 9, 2018
Merged
Merged
@gtback
Copy link
Contributor

gtback commented Mar 12, 2018

@varnerac This should be fixed now, but if not, feel free to reopen.

@gtback gtback added the bug label Jun 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gtback @varnerac