Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommend ditching acme-client in favor of uacme #19

Open
ddevault opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Recommend ditching acme-client in favor of uacme #19

ddevault opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@ddevault
Copy link

uacme is (1) much simpler and (2) actively maintained.

@michaelforney
Copy link
Collaborator

We use the acme-client from openbsd, which is still maintained, but I will take a look at uacme. I like the fact that uacme is challenge agnostic.

Thanks for the suggestion!

@ddevault
Copy link
Author

Aye, I'm familiar with acme-client. The Linux port is poorly maintained, and after digging through the code, I can see why - it's extremely over-engineered. I switched from acme-client to uacme a couple years ago and my life got measurably better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants