Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Runtime storage sync should use any storage node #3454

Closed
kostko opened this issue Oct 28, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3457
Closed

Runtime storage sync should use any storage node #3454

kostko opened this issue Oct 28, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3457
Assignees
Labels
c:runtime Category: runtime c:storage Category: storage

Comments

@kostko
Copy link
Member

kostko commented Oct 28, 2020

Currently storage node sync only uses nodes from the current storage committee. Instead, it should be also able to use (maybe with a lower priority) other storage nodes registered for the runtime to increase availability as certain runtime configurations (e.g., using a storage committee of size 1) make it more likely that the active committee does not have the required roots.

This should be backwards compatible and backported to the 20.11.x stable branch.

@kostko kostko added c:storage Category: storage c:runtime Category: runtime labels Oct 28, 2020
@ptrus ptrus self-assigned this Oct 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c:runtime Category: runtime c:storage Category: storage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants