go/scheduler: remove debug static validators option

[ptrus]

Fixes: #4215

[ptrus]

Cannot really test freezing with a single validator. This should either be tested in an e2e test with multiple validators or if we added an option for freezing to: "freeze the node, but allow manually unfreezing in the first epoch already".

Will open a follow up issue for this.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4222 (f95ac4d) into master (ff20d6b) will decrease coverage by 0.49%.
The diff coverage is 90.74%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4222      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.16%   68.67%   -0.50%     
==========================================
  Files         411      411              
  Lines       47514    47549      +35     
==========================================
- Hits        32861    32652     -209     
- Misses      10596    10848     +252     
+ Partials     4057     4049       -8     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...consensus/tendermint/apps/governance/governance.go	61.51% <ø> (ø)
go/consensus/tendermint/apps/scheduler/genesis.go	35.08% <ø> (+1.26%)	⬆️
...o/consensus/tendermint/apps/scheduler/scheduler.go	74.40% <0.00%> (+0.64%)	⬆️
go/oasis-node/cmd/genesis/genesis.go	55.14% <ø> (-0.28%)	⬇️
go/storage/tests/tester.go	98.76% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
go/consensus/tendermint/apps/scheduler/query.go	75.00% <50.00%> (ø)
go/oasis-node/cmd/node/node.go	55.79% <66.66%> (-0.71%)	⬇️
go/beacon/tests/tester.go	86.36% <85.18%> (-0.94%)	⬇️
go/consensus/tendermint/tests/genesis/genesis.go	92.48% <88.88%> (-5.14%)	⬇️
go/consensus/tendermint/tests/evidence.go	93.10% <100.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
... and 61 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff20d6b...f95ac4d. Read the comment docs.

[kostko]

I assume that since this option was omitempty, this shouldn't affect the chain context? Would be great to test that this works on testnet just to be sure.

[ptrus]

I assume that since this option was omitempty, this shouldn't affect the chain context? Would be great to test that this works on testnet just to be sure.

Yeah i think this should work, but i'll backport this and test on a testnet node.

[ptrus]

Started a fresh node built on this branch on testnet and is syncing 👍 - so the chain context stayed the same.

./oasis-node --version
Software version: 21.2-gitf95ac4de8
...