"Presentation" is capitalised as if it's a defined term, but I can't find a definition

[jogu]

There are various sentences like:

When Key Binding is not enforced, any entity in possession of an SD-JWT Presentation can forward the contents to third parties

where presentation has a capital P as if it's a defined term. Probably it should have an actual definition (I can't find one) but if not it should probably be lower cased?

[Sakurann]

This is how Presentation is defined in OID4VP:

Presentation: Data that is presented to a specific Verifier, derived from one or more Verifiable Credentials that can be from the same or different Credential Issuers.

https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VP/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-wg-draft.html#section-2-3.8

and I think it's better define it than just make it lower-case, as the term is used pretty frequently.

[bifurcation]

I don't think just removing the capitalization helps. It's still an undefined term. In the spirit of #374, it seems like we actually want two concepts here, (1) handing someone an Issuer JWT + disclosures, where they can verify its integrity, drop disclosures and/or hand it to someone else, and (2) handing someone an Issuer JWT + disclosures + KB JWT, where the only thing they can do is verify it.

[bc-pi]

I think #384 goes a long way towards addressing this.

I meant #394, sorry.

[Sakurann]

(I think you meant 394, @bc-pi..?)

[bc-pi]

I believe the merging of #394 clears this one up