Secure SEDP association_complete #1227
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Solution: A secure/unsecure SEDP writer should only write local publications/subscriptions that are secure/unsecure.
jrw972
force-pushed
the
sedp-secure-unregister-dispose
branch
from
8c11e9d
to
c44dc95
Compare
jrw972
requested review from
a user and
mitza-oci
and removed request for
a user
mitza-oci
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2019
mitza-oci
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2019
Secure SEDP association_complete (cherry picked from commit fa120a4) # Conflicts: # dds/DCPS/RTPS/Sedp.cpp # tools/IntermediateTypeLang/cpp/rapidjson
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sedp writes unsecure data on association complete
Solution: A secure/unsecure SEDP writer should only write local
publications/subscriptions that are secure/unsecure.