You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I realize this is probably being pedantic, but if we're going to call it None/No in the grouping, it'd be nice if the edit dialog called it None/No as well. There, it's called Normal, so I was really looking for the grouping to be Priority 3: Normal, and in this new format, Normal Priority.
Not the biggest deal in the world, of course, but I actually came here to see if there was an open bug on that so if it's up for discussion...
Note to self: also need to update the priority filter, so that it supports normal as well as none, to retain backwards compatibility with existing searches.
🔖 Feature description
Remove the need for numeric prefixes on the titles for
group by priority
, so that the priority names are clearer/more visible.✔️ Solution
Replace
Priority 3: None
withNo Priority
And similarly, change the names of other priorities to remove the numbers.
Retain the current sort order, to High Priority is first, and Low Priority is last.
❓ Alternatives
A more complicated way of achieving this was proposed in #1604.
📝 Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: