Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

show non-generalizable type parameters in type definitions #12837

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

garrigue
Copy link
Contributor

Error message used to be confusing, as it looked like there were two different variables.
Note that we are changing outcometree.mli, so this is a breaking change.

Copy link
Contributor

@goldfirere goldfirere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@@ -710,6 +710,10 @@ Working version
- #12831: Fix call to caml_call_realloc_stack for s390x in PIC mode
(Vincent Laviron, report by Jerry James, review by Miod Vallat)

* #12837: Show non-generalizable type parameters in type definitions
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is only breaking the compiler API, I think it would be clearer for most people to mark it as non-breaking.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, I don't know of people in the wild who depend on the outcometree type definition -- in any sort of supported way.

@garrigue garrigue merged commit 8b96c53 into ocaml:trunk Dec 19, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants