Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document the associativity of operators declared in Pervasives in Pervasives itself. #6709

vicuna opened this issue Dec 12, 2014 · 2 comments


None yet
2 participants
Copy link

commented Dec 12, 2014

Original bug ID: 6709
Reporter: @dbuenzli
Assigned to: @Octachron
Status: resolved (set by @dra27 on 2017-05-14T13:26:11Z)
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Version: 4.02.1
Target version: 4.06.0 +dev/beta1/beta2/rc1
Category: documentation
Tags: junior_job
Monitored by: @hcarty @dbuenzli

Bug description

Would be nice to have that directly in the API documentation. Rather than having to dig for and compute the actual associativity according to the structure of the operator.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 10, 2017

Comment author: @Octachron

I have a potential implementation (with precedence level too) here: #1167


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

commented May 14, 2017

Comment author: @dra27

#1167 merged onto trunk, so marking this one as done... for octachron's closure figures, obviously ;o)

@vicuna vicuna closed this May 14, 2017

@vicuna vicuna added this to the 4.06.0 milestone Mar 14, 2019

@vicuna vicuna added the feature-wish label Mar 20, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.