-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] No residue-resolved model for first 100 residues? #5
Comments
This does seem odd - given the rest looks really good! what happens if you just model these first 100 residues on their own? Can you show me the function you ran. One possibility is that you set the parameter R_lower to be 100? |
Very strange, I think a couple options to try, I suspect something in the defaults causing this. Could you try the following:
set lambda to be much larger:
and use this instead? |
Got this strange bug I haven't seen elsewhere in which I was modelling some data in Rex and the first 101 residues to be exact, posterior estimates are identical and so giving no resolution in any of the modelled uptakes. As can be seen from the coverage plot, there is quite good redundancy of peptides in this region with a broad range of dynamics, and the rest of the peptides in the protein seem to be modelled okay.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: