Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: improve Polytonic Greek support #19

Open
thlinard opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Feature request: improve Polytonic Greek support #19

thlinard opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@thlinard
Copy link

Hi,
In the current version, EB Garamond

  1. has support for Small Caps άέήίΰαβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψωϊϋόύώ
    but not for
    ἀἁἂἃἄἅἆἇἐἑἒἓἔἕἠἡἢἣἤἥἦἧἰἱἲἳἴἵἶἷὀὁὂὃὄὅὐὑὒὓὔὕὖὗὠὡὢὣὤὥὦὧὰὲὴὶὸὺὼᾀᾁᾂᾃᾄᾅᾆᾇᾐᾑᾒᾓᾔᾕᾖᾗᾠᾡᾢᾣᾤᾥᾦᾧᾰᾱᾲᾳᾴᾶᾷῂῃῄῆῇῐῑῒῖῗῠῡῢῤῥῦῧῲῳῴῶῷϏ

  2. doesn't provide support for alternate glyphs with adscript iota — missing complete GF Greek Plus support (+ alternate small caps with adscript iota);

  3. has support for superior Latin letters, but not for ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩαβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω

You can take a look at GF Greek Expert https://github.com/googlefonts/tools/tree/master/encodings/GF%20Glyph%20Sets/Greek

Many thanks!

@octaviopardo
Copy link
Owner

Hi, that s a lot of work of development and is not currently in the map. Maybe later in 2018! Thanks for the request though

@georgd
Copy link

georgd commented Dec 21, 2017

@thlinard As for small caps the missing support is due to this version still missing some features that are present in v0.016. If you have a look there, you'll find polytonic accented glyphs and iota adscriptum supported in small caps and that shall happen here too. Necessary for that is the reintegration of the original features (adapted to the new fonts) and the fixing of the mark anchors bug. However, I'm against putting any more precomposed small caps glyphs in the fonts, be it latin greek or cyrillic, that can easily be composed on the fly.

@thlinard
Copy link
Author

Hi Georg,

Glad to know the features are present in your version of EB Garamond, but I tried to obtain iota variants with it, and I failed (I confess I never used a cv* feature before: if I understood correctly, the cv81195 lookup in cv81 activates the alternate forms, but I probably don't have a software supporting a cv* lookup at hand).

Furthermore, the composition on the fly gave disastrous results in all browsers I tested. I can easily believe in a mark anchors bug, but the use of precomposed glyphs seems more robust.

Sadly, InDesign doesn't like your features either. I didn't test in a LaTeX environment, I guess this is your favorite test environment?

Anyway, if the glyphs were available in the previous version, that's another argument to keep them or restore them in the new version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants