fix: workaround for udpate-a-gist content definition

[0x-jerry]

fixes #718

[RomanHotsiy]

@cwxyz007 I've noticed there are a bunch of other places (mostly in response schemas) where gist files have an incorrect schema.

Here is the full list:

• In request and response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/create.json

  Line 40 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/create.json

  Line 373 in 6cb30a1

  "files": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/get.json

  Line 47 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/create.json

  Line 40 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/get-revision.json

  Line 54 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/list.json

  Line 61 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/list-starred.json

  Line 61 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/list-public.json

  Line 61 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

• In response:

  routes/openapi/api.github.com/operations/gists/list-for-user.json

  Line 68 in 6cb30a1

  "hello_world.rb": {

Could you also try to fix those in your PR too?

[0x-jerry]

@RomanHotsiy I have fixed all the incorrect schema that you list above, but I have no idea how to fix the test :)

[gr2m]

Thanks @cwxyz007 & @RomanHotsiy

[octokitbot]

🎉 This PR is included in version 28.0.2 🎉

The release is available on:

• GitHub release
• npm package (@latest dist-tag)

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀