Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for optional parameter installation for Webhook Payloads missing it #198

Closed
oscard0m opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #195
Closed

Add support for optional parameter installation for Webhook Payloads missing it #198

oscard0m opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #195
Assignees
@oscard0m
Labels
Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented
Projects
JS

Comments

@oscard0m
Copy link
Member

Context here: octokit/webhooks.js#266
@oscard0m oscard0m added the Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented label Oct 13, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to Inbox in JS Oct 13, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from Inbox to Bugs in JS Oct 13, 2020
@oscard0m oscard0m mentioned this issue Oct 13, 2020
Merged
@oscard0m oscard0m self-assigned this Oct 13, 2020
@gr2m gr2m closed this as completed in #195 Oct 14, 2020
JS automation moved this from Bugs to Done Oct 14, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 3.18.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@oscard0m oscard0m

Labels
Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented
Projects
No open projects
JS
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

fix: add event examples with installation key that don't have them yet octokit/webhooks
1 participant
@oscard0m