Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add job_run_id index on operator run tables for faster queries #750

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2023

Conversation

Mryashbhardwaj
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Mryashbhardwaj Mryashbhardwaj self-assigned this Mar 1, 2023
@Mryashbhardwaj Mryashbhardwaj marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2023 07:39
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 1, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4311246202

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.366%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4292898480: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 8469
Relevant Lines: 9169

💛 - Coveralls

@Mryashbhardwaj Mryashbhardwaj force-pushed the add_job_run_id_index_operator_run_table branch from 4581c4e to 159eee2 Compare March 2, 2023 06:31
@sbchaos sbchaos merged commit e0a244b into main Mar 7, 2023
@sbchaos sbchaos deleted the add_job_run_id_index_operator_run_table branch March 7, 2023 05:02
Mryashbhardwaj added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
…750)

* fix: add job_run_id index on operator run tables for faster queries

* fix: add job_run_id index on operator run tables for faster queries

* fix: migration file name
sbchaos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
…750) (#756)

* fix: add job_run_id index on operator run tables for faster queries

* fix: add job_run_id index on operator run tables for faster queries

* fix: migration file name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants