We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
感谢大佬开源,请问技术报告中Table 2: 针对MUGE数据集跨模态检索的结果展示中,文字说明on text-to-image retrieval AND image-to-text retrieval,没看错的话表中应该只展示了text-to-image retrieval。在另外两个数据集COCO-CN和 Flickr30K-CN都展示了图文和文图的检索效果,所以也想知道MUGE图文检索的效果。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
抱歉好像知乎上忘回你了。是个typo我会改掉,MUGE只做image retrieval不做text retrieval。
Sorry, something went wrong.
感谢大佬回复,再请教一下为什么MUGE不做图文检索任务的评测呢?是这个数据集不适合做这一块吗?
因为MUGE的检索任务当时主要是从中文电商搜索场景来源的,这个场景下主要关注的就是文本搜索query检索商品图片的效果,所以就只考虑了text-to-image retrieval这个方向的指标。反过来image-to-text retrieval当然也是可以计算的,只是大家都没做这个方向,就没有对比的对象了。具体指标的话,我们的base模型,zeroshot的image-to-text retrieval的R1/5/10分别为38.7 65.6 75.1,供您参考哈。
明白了,感谢大佬回复!
No branches or pull requests
感谢大佬开源,请问技术报告中Table 2: 针对MUGE数据集跨模态检索的结果展示中,文字说明on text-to-image retrieval AND image-to-text retrieval,没看错的话表中应该只展示了text-to-image retrieval。在另外两个数据集COCO-CN和 Flickr30K-CN都展示了图文和文图的检索效果,所以也想知道MUGE图文检索的效果。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: