Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New functionnality] - Insensitive option #466

Closed
ggt opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

[New functionnality] - Insensitive option #466

ggt opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ggt
Copy link

ggt commented Nov 24, 2023

Hi,
First, thanks to have added the option for restarting at an offset!

I think if you have the time, a new good option should be implemented: "-i // insensitive search" to brute-force from a "dict" file and removes duplicate searchs automatically. This options should be cool because we won't have to have multiple files with the same data [a-Z] and [a-z].

Thanks!

@firefart
Copy link
Collaborator

That's not really possible as we would need to keep track of every word processed in memory and that would result in enormous memory usage. The best solution for this usecase is to use the stdin wordlist feature like

cat wordlist1 wordlist2 wordlist 3 | sort -u | gobuster dir -w - ....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants